As I've stated in previous posts on this message board, I think IronCAD is an exceptional product and IronCAD LCC is a great company. I've also stated that what they've done with the licensing scheme is well within their rights. It's just that they've made life a little more difficult for their customers, many of them are long-time customers without which their would be no IronCAD, or it would be called "PTC's Pro-Iron" featuring the ProBall or something.
Let's face it, most customers are not self-employed, so it's really no skin off their nose if their company has to buy another license or two. I don't care, I'm not expecting a bonus anyway. But getting their employers to do that is another story. And if the employers won't buy more licenses, it becomes very frustrating for the users. This is not IronCAD's fault, but they've forced the issue.
I think the general consensus is that we are requesting an affordable means of buying a license per instance of IronCAD (concurrently running IronCAD sessions) instead of buying a license for every machine and having a license tied to the machine's hardware configuration. Dongle and/or a realistic license server.
If buying a telecommuter license and then using it concurrently with a normal license is endorsed by IronCAD I'd like to hear it from them, since it seems to negate their whole new licensing scheme.id='Arial'>