Yes, I am using that right now, but I do not use my machine for IronCAD alone. I am satisfied with the performance I am getting now, I am currently running AMD64 x2 4800, SLY 7600'sa and 4gb of dar400 RAM. in our workstations. We use them for graphic design and IronCAD. I have just been putting off building our new "Vista ready" workstations until I get the OK from Cary and the team at IC. Microsoft has been working out the permissions and drivers for Vista via beta releases for well over a year and that is the only reason I have have posted here multiple times about a "Vista" timeline. Adobe CS3 will be released very soon and it is built to take advantage of multiple cores and 64 bit processing. I know that IronCAD does not have to engineering staff or budget (like Adobe) to reinvent the wheel, but I have received the same reply for over a year "We are looking into it"
Don't get me wrong, I love IronCAD. I have been one of the biggest IronCAD cheerleaders in our "very large" company user network. I just get scared of every version release. We have experienced new, even worse issues that are unrelated the the original fixes in the last release and PU1. These issues are things that slow down our company and can cause mistakes which cost money. No, I am not talking about a hotkey issue . In the end I guess I just want it all, but obviously that is not an option. But having things work the way they are designed to, without having to pay for another release to fix them sounds logical.
Steve