Sharath
-
Posts
37 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Downloads
Articles
Gallery
Posts posted by Sharath
-
-
On 2/23/2024 at 4:26 AM, Cary OConnor said:
Using External Links, the behavior of collaboration is as follows currently (without a Data Management System):
Example Case: Main.ics is the main scene with an Assembly and two parts under the assembly. Part1.ics and Part2.ics are both external linked files.
- If Main.ics is NOT opened on a machine. Users on different machines can open Part1.ics and Part2.ics independently to work on the files.
- If Part1.ics and/or Part2.ics are opened on user machines, another user can open Main.ics and work on the content of that file. If the user tries to edit Part1.ics or Part2.ics, there will be a read-only warning that these have already been opened and edited. Note: Changes to Part1/2.ics from the original users will not appear in Main.ics when saved (Main.ics will need to be reopened to get the updates).
- If Main.ics is opened first, users will get a read-only warning that Part1/2.ics are in use if they try to open them on another machine. Basically the owning file of the external links will lock out the other files on open if they are not already open.
Now if you have a Data Management system, this is different as these systems use the concepts of Check-out on the linked files. So the opening order is not restricted like it is above. A data management system could be Synergy, DDM from CSI, or our CAXA EDM system.
Hopefully, that will help explain the link management.
Now, I don't want to send you down a rabbit hole, but there is more involved way around this using Shrinkwrap. Basically, users could open a simplified version of the Main file (that refers to a Part1_Simple.ics file, for example). That way Part1.ics is never locked when the main file is opened. However, you either have to keep updating the Shrinkwrap file so that when the Main Simplified is open it gets the latest changes or users will need to know that the simplified is a placeholder and when they need the real update, they open the full model version. One of the nice things about this, it can help prevent modifications from happening in the Main file if not wanted. Below is a video on this.
Hi Cary , It seems like I've run into a couple of hiccups. Shrink-wrapping a big assembly can be a bit tricky, especially when dealing with hundreds of parts assemblies . It appears that the shrink-wrap feature works best when selecting parts individually, but that's quite time-consuming in our case. Or is there a way to select big assemblies one ? . As for the linked subassemblies, I've managed to create a test file with a main layout containing two linked subassemblies. However, when i try to select a particular part to edit and the remaining stays as simple , the selection seems to be happening randomly, rather than letting you choose the specific part you want. Does that sound about right?
-
Hi everyone, we're having trouble with three people working on the same project simultaneously. For instance, in our situation, all three of us are working on different parts of the project, and there's one main project layout. Currently, if anyone opens the layout, the individual files become inaccessible to others, which is not ideal. I believe other software allows multiple people to work on one project concurrently. Is this type of collaboration possible in IronCAD, or are we missing something here?
-
3 minutes ago, IronKevin said:
Looks like a bug, filed.
QA 81000
Thank you
-
5 minutes ago, IronKevin said:
I'm not seeing that here, can you send your file?
If you don't want to post it here please send it to support@ironcad.com
-
Hi all
Does anyone know why the etched markings disappear when I unfold the sheet metal? Here, I've attached two pictures: the first one shows the company name that was etched, but when unfolded, it disappears. It was working fine on the old version of IronCAD. Are there any settings I can change or is this an error?
Thanks
-
Hello,
I understand the concept of the leg length decreasing relative to the bend length increase , but this in not the actual case on overbends.
As shown below, the underbends are ok, but the overbends get shorter until the leg length disappears with any angle over 168 deg.
This is when using ‘inside & outside sharp’ with either option of ‘Maintain folded length when changing angle’ and ‘Maintain specified length’.
The option ‘Maintain unfolded length when changing angle’ works with ‘inside and outside sharp’
Anyone know how to keeps the bend length same when we do over bends
-
Thank you all
-
-
I updated IronCAD 2024 and loaded all my old settings into the newer version. When attempting to copy my keyboard shortcuts, I followed the instructions in the picture below. However, I encountered confusion when it instructed me to change the IronCAD name in two places. As I edit, I see multiple instances of IronCAD with different numbers, making it unclear which one to modify. I am uncertain if I am editing it correctly. If anyone knows the correct procedure, please guide me on how to do it properly.
-
4 hours ago, SSIMMONS said:
Yes, it is a new version of the software so it is like buying a new software. New key needs to be purchased.
Thank you
-
22 hours ago, IronKevin said:
You should be able to get your 2024 license from your local reseller.
Thank you
-
Hi all hope you all had nice Christmas and New year
When updating to the 2024 version of IronCAD, upon completing the process and launching the application, it prompts for a new license key. Do we need to obtain a new license key specifically for the 2024 version, as the license key for the 2023 version will not work with the updated software ?
Thanks
-
20 hours ago, SSIMMONS said:
Run sfc/scannow in command prompt
its saying there is no such command
-
20 hours ago, IronKevin said:
Or try this:
IronCAD cleanup:
1. Uninstall IronCAD.
2. Delete these folders:
C:\Program Files\IronCAD\2023
C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\IronCAD
C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\IronCAD
C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\CAXA
C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Roaming\CAXA
3. Run regedit.exe and delete:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\IronCAD
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\IronCAD
4. Go to the folder %TEMP% and empty it as much as Windows will allow.
5. Reinstall IronCAD.I tried this yesterday still the same
-
11 hours ago, IronKevin said:
Did you try an uninstall and reinstall?
yes i tried still the same
-
-
14 minutes ago, Cary OConnor said:
I'm not sure why it worked in the other case (maybe a tolerance on the resultant face used for the mirror plane).
Couple of notes:
1. The curved stock has some specific requirements. For example, the start of the curve stock 2D Sketch needs to be a 0,0 of the sketch and needs to be tangent to the X at that location). When you start to move that off that location, other issues can happen.
I moved it to the start and made it tangent and it seems to work now (Green part). Again, I don't recommend this approach but it appears to work.
Okay Thanks Cary
-
9 hours ago, jolizon590016 said:
You Hopper model with a Mirror is the problem. Using the Convert to Sheetmetal part resolves it.
sorry I don't understand
-
4 hours ago, Cary OConnor said:
The issue is you cannot mirror the Curve Stock. There can only be 1 base stock. So you would need to mirror the sketch of the curve stock and then mirror the other features. Note you need to create a reference face using a temp shape that you suppress.
so if that the case , how the other parts (trough) working hopper not , I made the trough by using mirror the curved stock. that one unfold okay
-
Hi all , Here I am attaching two sheet metal parts in a scene , that are been made in similar way . but when I unfold them one seems okay but the other showing error . I couldn't figured out why . if anyone know why its happening please let me know
Thanks
-
1 hour ago, jolizon590016 said:
You are on the right track doing a customize symbols and using it as an catalog item. Just make sure you have labeled and saved your own catalog.
Cheers
yes I did
Thanks
-
-
17 minutes ago, Malcolm Crowe said:
Hi Sarath,
I realise that you were specifically asking regarding ICD, but CAXA has this Weld Bead capability. The attached video starts with demonstrating how to create Stacked Weld Symbols in CAXA, but from around the 1:37 mark, the video then demonstrates the Weld Bead tool in CAXA.
Malcolm
Thanks Malcolm
I only familiar with ICD , never used CAXA , looks like CAXA have more options than ICD
I think I have to start using CAXA
-
Linked Assemblies in a Project layout
in General Discussion
Posted
Yeah this could be the option