Jump to content

SSIMMONS

Community Members
  • Posts

    600
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SSIMMONS

  1. 55 minutes ago, HDEAR said:

    Hi Spencer - yes that was me who asked and it doesn't look promising.
     

     

    Wait, what? I had asked them directly in person and they did fix it. I have used it many times over the years.

     

    -Spencer

  2. If I recall correctly, the .IFC file was also not able to be imported about three years ago and the enhancement request went through. So there is hope for them to find a way or they might already have one.

     

    -Spencer

  3. Indirectly I have. We work with a company that uses TEKLA software, which I believe uses this file format for each part. We have them export into .IFC files and import those into IC though. I have never dealt with the native file format directly. I know that isn't helpful, but you may be able to suggest a .IFC export that you can then import. It is my understanding that the .IFC file format is fairly standard and widespread in certain disciplines (architecture/ Civil maybe). Hopefully this helps in someway. 

     

    -Spencer

  4. I use several of both and the only concern I would have with a curved monitor is getting below 32" because the curve will just be detrimental at that point. The wider monitor seems to be A LOT easier to use on a day to day. and if you have two, they sit very well side by side, but you would need to be in a chair in front of them for it to be useful. I use mine as a gaming monitor mostly. Think of it as a lens, your head needing to be at the focal point where the ant would be burning. Only the ant is your head and the curve is only in one plane. I have loved it though and for a desk and chair application it is nice for sure.

     

    -Spencer

     

     

    Sorry about the ant analogy, it just seemed the clearest way to describe it.

  5. I work with mostly sheet metal and large industrial machine design and I cant stand working with perspective. However, I do 3D animation for advertisements etc. also and I do use it for that (Blender). So both?

     

    Side Note: My eyesight is horrific. I haven't known where I am for ten years....help

    • Haha 1
  6. Depending on the complexity of the box, you should be able to make a new one in less than a minute or two using the miter flange tool under the sheet metal tab. It can be a bit weird to get used to because a bend and not a bend with stock needs to be used. Make sure to uncheck they box in the dialog (cant remember exactly what it says) if you want the flanges (or sides) to be different at some point. 

     

    -Spencer

  7. 16 hours ago, IronKevin said:

    The large mesh made many facets parts in and assembly. Each would have to be individually solidified then Boolean all together to one part, assuming all that succeeded.

    I was afraid you were going to say that haha. Thanks for the information.

  8. Cary, 

    Here is a much simpler example to work with. It will be a lot easier to solve using this hollow cube. Sorry for the complex model before. I would assume that anything that works on this simple model should be adaptable to work with the more complex shape (if my computer doesn't melt first haha).

     

    -Spencer

    box test.stl

  9. I have had the same issue recently and I am saving local (latest release of IC2022, about to switch to IC 2023). Hit save and boom, application just completely goes away with no save, but this also happens when I don't hit save sometimes. I also save constantly, but that's a habit I had to learn because of things like this. My advice, just save every five minutes or so with Ctrl+S. I lost about two hours of work yesterday because I got complacent, but it's a reminder that something can go wrong at anytime. 

     

    -Spencer

  10. I have done literally dozens if not more than 100 complete detail packages and assembly drawings using a mixture of IronCAD and IronCADs drawing suite (ICD). There are moments of frustration like any software, but you can do just about anything (maybe some workarounds here and there) you will need to do to go from design to manufacturing. There is also CAXA, which I admittedly don't use much except to import ACAD geometry from customers etc, but it's a lot more like traditional AutoCAD and will also be included in the suite of IC tools. I know you said you don't want to download a bunch of trials etc., but I would make an exception for IronCAD and give it a shot. The people on this forum will be happy to help you out as you go through the stages of setting everything up and having your questions answered. I am a design engineer and project manager and have been using IC since late 2017 and have never not hit a deadline due to IC related issues so I am confident it can do what you need it to. The translation bundle will allow you to import/ export tons of different filetypes so no issue there.

     

    -Spencer

     

    Edit: I also want to mention that I am in no way affiliated with IronCAD and have no incentive to give you positive information about the company. 

    • Like 1
  11. Unfortunately I have the skills and knowledge to test this, but am not a civil engineer so my work on buildings and structures is passed along to be stamped (I am a Mechanical Engineer by degree). That being said, a civil engineer may also be able to sign off for you if you can find one.

     

    -Spencer

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...