Jump to content

CLOFFBERG

Members
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    Sweden

CLOFFBERG's Achievements

Block

Block (2/9)

0

Reputation

  1. Hello Micke This is how I work or would like . I work in a Structural part as much as possible (and sheetmetal due to the radius limitation in the structural part, but that’s a different question). But like Cary wrote I’ve been working in quite a lot in sketch based program but also to Catia V4 which isn’t. I like to be able to use the rollback state and go back in the tree and add draft angles and radius. I can go back and do changes and I feel like I’m in control. I work almost only with sketches on planes. In the cases I haven’t the sketches on planes they seems to liver their on life, if I change something else higher up in the tree they quite often move away (often 90 degree). I don’t think you will have this problem in Innovated part. What I miss is that I can’t extrude up to a plane just an instable surface. I would like to work with Boolean operation. It’s possible both in structural and innovated part mode but it’s ridiculous hard or more or less impossible to follow the operations. In Innovated it’s not possible go back to your “original” part/body and add features nor you can’t replace bodies you have to delete them and then add a new Boolean operation, in structural it’s very hard to do. I have been trying to use Trim operations but it got it restrictions. I’m quite new to IC and still learning. /Christoffer
  2. Maybe this question is placed in the wrong sub forum. Is it possible to create one surface from two curves that are crossing each other (it's normally how a surface is calculated) I have tried with sweep but it only sweep from the "section curve" and I have tried with ruled surface but it only get one quarter of the surface. I don't want to move my curves to the start point of the guide curve, they might be changed. I don't want the surface to be like in the attached model yta.ics
  3. I do agree it's a good program and I use it, but it would be much better if the analys was integrated to IC.
  4. I would like to be able to use planes as reference when I extrude, from plane to another or just up to a plane. I only work in structured part I think it's easier to follow the design and do changes like adding draft's and radius afterwards.
×
×
  • Create New...